How is that not a good enough reason to eat at a place? And obviously you do care if you’re telling people that it’s not a good enough reason to eat at a place they may happen to enjoy.
Mind you I don’t like pizza hut and will definitely joke around with someone who does, but to say that they just shouldn’t go because I consider other pizza to be better is ridiculous. If you don’t like a place so be it, but to tell someone they don’t have a valid reason for going to it simply because somewhere out there there’s a better place is absurd.
don’t misquote me fattybomatty. I said it’s not a good enough reason IMO – which means "in my opinion." That doesn’t mean it isn’t a good enough reason for another person.
You asked if it’s any good. A person I know from work ordered the pasta to-go. Said it was crap. I saw it. It looked like crappy pasta. I agree with that person’s opinion and it furthered my opinion that Pizza Hut is crap.
Take the advice, or leave it. Your choice. IMO, you’d be nuts to waste your money – even if that was the only pasta in town.
IMO, if a place serves crappy food, and it’s the only place in town, the sole fact that a place is the only place in town, is not reason enough to eat the food.
I lived in a small town like that for a year. It had one place to eat – a sort of family restaurant bar (anyone who has lived in a really small town knows the kind of place I mean). The Jack Daniel’s was the same Jack Daniel’s as served at any other typical bar in America. The food was crap. One taste was all it took. I never ate there again, even though the burgers were tolerable – I cannot, however, say that I never drank alcohol there again.